Comparison of the Efficacy of Zoledronate and Denosumab in Patients with Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The comparison of the efficacy of zoledronate and denosumab for treating osteoporosis is controversial, and few randomized controlled trials have compared these two drugs in practical patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). We conducted a randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of zoledronate and denosumab in patients with acute OVCF, with a focus on the occurrence of new OVCF. Methods: We enrolled 206 subjects who had their first acute OVCF, without any previous history of osteoporosis medication. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous zoledronate once a year or subcutaneous denosumab twice a year. We investigated the OVCF recurrence, clinical outcome, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers over 12 months. Results: The final cohort comprised 89 participants (mean age of 75.82 ± 9.34 years, including 74 women [83.15%]) in the zoledronate group and 86 patients (mean age of 75.53 ± 10.23 years, including 71 women [82.56%]) in the denosumab group. New OVCFs occurred in 8 patients (8.89%) in the zoledronate group and 11 patients (12.79%) in the denosumab group (odds ratio, 1.485 [95% confidence interval, 0.567-3.891], p = 0.419). No significant difference was observed in the survival analysis between the two groups (p = 0.407). The clinical outcome, including the visual analog scale score for pain and simple radiographic findings, did not differ between the two groups. The changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were also not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, drug-related adverse events did not differ between the groups in terms of safety. Conclusions: The efficacy of zoledronate was comparable to that of denosumab in terms of the occurrence of new OVCFs, as well as of the overall clinical course in patients with their first acute OVCF. Notably, this study represents the first comparison of these two drugs in patients with acute OVCF. However, further research with large-scale and long-term follow-up is necessary.

Digital therapeutics-based lumbar core exercise for patients with low back pain: A prospective exploratory pilot study.

Objective: This study aimed to implement a digital therapeutics-based approach based on motion detection technology and analyze the clinical results for patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial was conducted with 22 patients who performed mobile app-based sitting core twist exercise for 12 weeks. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for LBP, Oswestry Disability Index-Korean version (K-ODI), and EuroQol-5 dimension 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L) every 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. Laboratory tests for factors associated with muscle metabolism, plain X-ray for evaluating sagittal balance, and magnetic resonance imaging for calculating cross-sectional area (CSA) of back muscles were performed at pretreatment and 12 weeks post-treatment. Results: The study population included 20 female patients with an average age of 45.77 ± 15.45 years. The clinical outcomes gradually improved throughout the study period in the VAS for LBP (from 6.05 ± 2.27 to 2.86 ± 1.86), K-ODI (from 16.18 ± 6.19 to 8.64 ± 5.58), and EQ-5D-5L (from 11.09 ± 3.24 to 7.23 ± 3.89) (p < 0.001, respectively). The laboratory test results did not show significant changes. Pelvic incidence (from 53.99 ± 9.70° to 50.80 ± 9.20°, p = 0.002) and the mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (from 8.97± .67° to 5.28 ± 8.57°, p = 0.027) decreased significantly. Additionally, CSA of erector spinae and total back muscles increased by 5.20% (p < 0.001) and 3.08% (p = 0.013), respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the efficacy of digital therapy-based lumbar core exercise for LBP is favorable. However, further large-scale randomized controlled studies are necessary.

Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Elderly Patients Over 65 Years of Age Compared to Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Spine surgery rates are increasing in the elderly population due to social aging, and it is known that prognoses related to surgery are worse for the elderly compared to younger individuals. However, minimally invasive surgery, such as full endoscopic surgery, is considered safe with low complication rates due to minimal damage to surrounding tissues. In this study, we compared outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) in elderly and younger patients with disc herniation in the lumbosacral region. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 249 patients who underwent TELD at a single center between January 2016 to December 2019, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Patients were allocated to 2 groups: a young group aged ≤ 65 years (n = 202) or an elderly group aged > 65 years (n = 47). We evaluated baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, surgery-related outcomes, radiological outcomes, perioperative complications, and adverse events during the 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, including age, general condition based on American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification grade, age-Charlson Comorbidity Index, and disc degeneration, were worse in elderly group (p < 0.001). However, except for leg pain at 4 weeks after surgery, overall outcomes, including pain improvement, radiological change, operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay, were not different between the 2 groups. Furthermore, the rates of perioperative complications (9 patients [4.46%] in the young group and 3 patients [6.38%] in the elderly group, p = 0.578) and adverse events over the 3-year follow-up period (32 patients [15.84%] in the young group and 9 patients [19.15%] in the elderly group, p = 0.582) were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that TELD produces similar outcomes in both elderly and younger patients with a herniated disc in the lumbosacral region. TELD can be considered a safe option for appropriately selected elderly patients.

Reference Standards for Digital Infrared Thermography Measuring Surface Temperature of the Upper Limbs.

(1) Background: although digital infrared thermographic imaging (DITI) is used for diverse medical conditions of the upper limbs, no reference standards have been established. This study aims to establish reference standards by analyzing DITI results of the upper limbs. (2) Methods: we recruited 905 healthy Korean adults and conducted thermography on six regions (dorsal arm, ventral arm, lateral arm, medial arm, dorsal hand, and ventral hand region). We analyzed the data based on the proximity of regions of interest (ROIs), sex, and age. (3) Results: the average temperature (°C) and temperature discrepancy between the right and the left sides (ΔT) of each ROI varied significantly (p < 0.001), ranging from 28.45 ± 5.71 to 29.74 ± 5.14 and from 0.01 ± 0.49 to 0.15 ± 0.62, respectively. The temperature decreased towards the distal ROIs compared to proximal ROIs. The average temperatures of the same ROIs were significantly higher for men than women in all regions (p < 0.001). Across all regions, except the dorsal hand region, average temperatures tended to increase with age, particularly in individuals in their 30s and older (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: these data could be used as DITI reference standards to identify skin temperature abnormalities of the upper limbs. However, it is important to consider various confounding factors, and further research is required to validate the accuracy of our results under pathological conditions.

Reference Standard for Digital Infrared Thermography of the Surface Temperature of the Lower Limbs.

Digital infrared thermographic imaging (DITI) is a supplementary diagnostic technique to visualize the surface temperature of the human body. However, there is currently no reference standard for the lower limbs for accurate diagnosis. In this study, we performed DITI on the lower limbs of 905 healthy Korean volunteers (411 males and 494 females aged between 20 and 69 years) to obtain reference standard data. Thermography was conducted on the front, back, lateral sides, and sole area, and 188 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted according to the proximity of ROIs, sex, and age groups. The mean temperatures of ROIs ranged from 24.60 ± 5.06 to 28.75 ± 5.76 °C and the absolute value of the temperature difference between both sides reached up to 1.06 ± 2.75 °C. According to subgroup analysis, the sole area had a significantly lower temperature than any other areas, men had higher temperatures than women, and the elderly had higher temperatures than the young adults except for the 20s age group (p < 0.001, respectively). This result could be used as a foundation for the establishment of a reference standard for DITI. Practical patient DITI can be accurately interpreted using these data, and it can serve as a basis for further scientific research.

Comparison of Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery for Single-Level Lumbar Fusion.

AIM: To evaluate, and to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and open surgery for single-level lumbar fusion over a minimum of 10-year follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 87 patients who underwent spinal fusion at the L4 - L5 level between January 2004 and December 2010. Based on the surgical method, the patients were divided into the open surgery (n=44) and MIS groups (n=43). We evaluated baseline characteristics, perioperative comparisons, postoperative complications, radiologic findings, and patientreported outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was > 10 years in both groups (open surgery, 10.50 years; MIS, 10.16 years). The operative time was longer in the MIS group (4.37 h) than that in the open surgery group (3.34 h) (p=0.001). Estimated blood loss was lower in the MIS group (281.40 mL) than in the open surgery group (440.23 mL) (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, adjacent segment disease, and pseudoarthrosis, did not differ between the groups. Plain radiographic findings of the lumbar spine did not differ between the two groups. Visual scores for back/leg pain and the Oswestry disability index did not differ between the two groups, preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: After a minimum of the 10-year follow-up, postoperative complications and clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between patients who underwent open fusion and MIS fusion at the L4 - L5 level.

Endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis.

Background: Open decompression with fusion is the gold-standard surgical technique for spondylolisthesis. However, it may be too extensive for patients with foraminal stenosis with stable spondylolisthesis. The endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ELF) technique was developed as a minimally invasive surgical option for foraminal stenosis. Some authors have reported the outcomes of ELF for various spondylolistheses. However, few studies have demonstrated foraminal stenosis in advanced stable spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to describe the surgical technique and results of ELF for radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis. Methods: Consecutive 22 patients who suffered from radiculopathy with spondylolisthesis underwent ELF. The inclusion criterion was unilateral radicular leg pain due to foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis. After the percutaneous transforaminal approach, foraminal decompression was performed using various surgical devices under endoscopic visualization. Surgical outcomes were measured using the visual analog pain score, Oswestry disability index, and modified MacNab criteria. Results: Pain scores and functional outcomes improved significantly during the 12-month follow-up periods. The rate of clinical improvement was 95.5% (21 of 22 patients). One patient experienced a dural tear and subsequent open surgery. Conclusion: ELF can be effective in foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis. Technical points specializing in foraminal decompression in spondylolisthesis are required for clinical success.

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) has been tried as the latest alternative technique to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interobody fusion (MIS-TLIF) since mid-2010, the evidence is still lacking. We compared the clinical outcome and safety of Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find literature comparing Endo-LIF to MIS-TLIF. The results retrieved were last updated on December 11, 2020. The perioperative outcome included the operation time, blood loss, complication, and hospital stay. The clinical outcomes included Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the radiological outcome included pseudoarthosis rate with 12-month minimum follow-up. RESULTS: Four retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study comprising 423 patients (183 Endo-LIF and 241 MIS-TLIF) were included, and the pooled data analysis revealed low heterogeneity between studies in our review. Baseline characteristics including age and sex were not different between the two groups. Operation time was significantly longer in Endo- LIF (mean difference [MD], 23.220 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.669-35.771; p=0.001). However, Endo-LIF resulted in less perioperative blood loss (MD, -144.710 mL; 95% CI, 247.941-41.478; p=0.023). Although VAS back pain at final (MD, -0.120; p=0.586), leg pain within 2 weeks (MD, 0.005; p=0.293), VAS leg pain at final (MD, 0.099; p=0.099), ODI at final (MD, 0.141; p=0.093) were not different, VAS back pain within 2 weeks was more favorable in the Endo-LIF (MD, -1.538; 95% CI, -2.044 to -1.032; p<0.001). On the other hand, no statistically significant group difference in complication rate (relative risk [RR], 0.709; p=0.774), hospital stay (MD, -2.399; p=0.151), and pseudoarthrosis rate (RR, 1.284; p=0.736) were found. CONCLUSION: Relative to MIS-TLIF, immediate outcomes were favorable in Endo-LIF in terms of blood loss and immediate VAS back pain, although complication rate, mid-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rate were not different. However, the challenges for Endo-LIF include longer operation time which means a difficult learning curve and limited surgical indication which means patient selection bias. Larger-scale, well-designed study with long-term follow-up and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm and update the results of this systematic review.

Safety and Efficacy of Bone Cement (Spinofill®) for Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Compression Fracture : A Preliminary Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Although several commercialized bone cements are used during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), there are no reports using domestic products from South Korea. In this study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of Spinofill® (Injecta Inc., Gunpo, Korea), a new polymethyl methacrylate product. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, and single-arm clinical trial of 30 participants who underwent PVP using Spinofill® for painful thoracolumbar OVCF was performed with 6-months follow-up. Clinical and surgical outcomes included the Visual analog scale (VAS), Korean-Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and Odom's criteria, complication rate, and recurrence rate. Radiological outcomes were evaluated by measuring the findings of postoperative computed tomography and simple radiograph. RESULTS: The pain of VAS (from 8.95±1.05 to 4.65±2.06, p<0.001) and the life quality based on K-ODI (from 33.95±5.84 to 25.65±4.79, p<0.001) improved significantly, and successful patient satisfaction were achieved in 20 patients (66.7%) 1 day after surgery. These immediate improvements were maintained or more improved during the follow-up. There was no surgery- or product-related complications, but OVCF recurred in two patients (6.7%). Favorable cement interdigitation was reported in 24 patients (80.0%), and extra-vertebral cement leakage was reported in 13 patients (43.0%). The mean vertebral height ratio (from 60.49%±21.97% to 80.07%±13.16%, p<0.001) and segmental kyphotic angle (from 11.46°±8.50° to 7.79°±6.08°, p=0.002) improved one day after surgery. However, these short-term radiological findings somewhat regressed at the end. CONCLUSION: The overall outcomes of PVP using Spinofill® were as favorable as those of other conventionally used products.

A New Grading System for Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation on Sagittal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Agreement Study.

Understanding the degree of disc migration is essential in order to diagnose, treat, and assess the prognosis of migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Based on anatomical configuration, we developed a simple six-level grading system for migrated lumbar disc herniation. We aimed to evaluate whether the new grading system was reliable and could replace the previous grading system. We selected 101 cases from our database. Two independent raters evaluated the magnetic resonance images using each grading system. Interobserver, intraobserver, and inter-grading system agreements were assessed using kappa statistics. The most common migration pattern was low-grade inferior migration. Interobserver agreements between the two readers showed substantial agreement in the first and second assessments (k = 0.753 and 0.756, respectively). The intraobserver agreement of reader 1 revealed substantial agreement (k = 0.733), while that of reader 2 revealed almost perfect agreement (k = 0.829). The strengths of the agreements of the new grading system were higher than those of the Lee-Kim grading system. The two grading systems agreed almost perfectly for most measurements. The new grading system was reliable and feasible to determine migrated LDH grade. It allowed for a more intuitive, objective measurement and helped select surgical options.

Comparison of Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Interbody Fusion for Discogenic Low Back Pain.

AIM: To compare lateral (direct [DLIF] or oblique [OLIF]) and posterior (posterior [PLIF] or transforaminal [TLIF]) lumbar interbody fusion results in patients with the same indication of discogenic low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients who underwent single-level DLIF/OLIF or PLIF/TLIF with at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups: a lateral group (n=24) who underwent DLIF/OLIF and a posterior group (n=22) who underwent PLIF/TLIF. Clinical, surgical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline factors, including demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and preoperative radiological findings, were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, the clinical and radiological outcomes at 1-year post-surgery did not differ between the two groups. However, the DLIF/OLIF procedure conferred significant advantages as follows: favorable postoperative low back pain and patient satisfaction at 1-week and 1-month post-surgery; shorter operation time (mean 173.33 ± 11.54 versus 208.64 ± 17.48 min, p < 0.001); less blood loss during surgery (mean 127.50 ± 41.36 versus 372.73 ± 123.21 mL, p < 0.001); and greater restoration of calibrated disc height at 1-year post-surgery (mean 5.80 ± 1.44 versus 0.50 ± 1.22, p=0.008). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. However, complications tended to be more frequent in the lateral group; 7 (29.2%) patients in the lateral group and 3 patients (13.6%) in the posterior group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the lateral group achieved better perioperative outcomes and disc height restoration than the posterior group, although there was no significant difference in the 1-year clinical outcomes.

Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive versus open lumbar fusion: a minimum 10-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to compare, after a long-term follow-up, the incidence and features of adjacent segment disease (ASDis) following lumbar fusion surgery performed via an open technique using conventional interbody fusion plus transpedicular screw fixation or a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using a tubular retractor together with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a follow-up period > 10 years who had undergone instrumented lumbar fusion at the L4-5 level between January 2004 and December 2010. The patients were divided into an open surgery group and MIS group based on the surgical method performed. Baseline characteristics and radiological findings, including factors related to ASDis, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of ASDis and related details, including diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and treatment, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 119 patients who had undergone lumbar fusion at the L4-5 level in the study period, 32 were excluded according to the exclusion criteria. The remaining 87 patients were included as the final study cohort and were divided into an open group (n = 44) and MIS group (n = 43). The mean follow-up period was 10.50 (range 10.0-14.0) years in the open group and 10.16 (range 10.0-13.0) years in the MIS group. The overall facet joint violation rate was significantly higher in the open group than in the MIS group (54.5% vs 30.2%, p = 0.022). However, in terms of adjacent segment degeneration, there were no significant differences in corrected disc height, segmental angle, range of motion, or degree of listhesis of the adjacent segments between the two groups during follow-up. The overall incidence of ASDis was 33.3%, with incidences of 31.8% in the open group and 34.9% in the MIS group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.822). Additionally, detailed diagnosis and treatment factors were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: After a minimum 10-year follow-up, the incidence of ASDis did not differ significantly between patients who had undergone open fusion and those who had undergone MIS fusion at the L4-5 level.

The irony of the transforaminal approach: A comparative cohort study of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for foraminal versus paramedian lumbar disc herniation.

ABSTRACT: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is useful for soft lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Although the transforaminal approach can reach the foraminal disc zone, the risk of exiting nerve root irritation along the path is considerable. Few studies have assessed the difficulties of TELD for foraminal LDH. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical results of TELD between foraminal or far-lateral LDH and paramedian LDH.Between June 2016 and July 2017, 135 consecutive patients with single-level LDH were treated with TELD for 2 years. Among them, 25 patients had foraminal or far-lateral LDH (foraminal group), and the remaining 110 patients had central or subarticular LDH (paramedian group). Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog pain scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and modified Macnab criteria.The foraminal group showed a higher rate of significant access pain (24.00% vs 8.19%, P < .05). The foraminal group also had a longer duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and return to work (all P < .05). Pain scores and functional status were significantly improved in both groups. Although there were no differences in the outcomes at 2 years postoperatively, early pain and disability at 6 weeks were higher in the foraminal group.Ironically, the early clinical results of TELD for foraminal LDH may be less favorable than those for paramedian LDH. Therefore, great care should be taken during TELD for foraminal or far-lateral LDH.

Factors Predicting the Clinical Outcome After Trans-sacral Epiduroscopic Laser Decompression for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

OBJECTIVE: Previous literatures have demonstrated widely variable clinical results after transsacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) and the factors predicting outcomes are not yet established. Therefore, we analyzed the clinical outcome and associated predictive factors of SELD in patients with lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2018, 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD and followed up at least 6 months were enrolled. The overall success rate (excellent or good results at final follow-up) was 58.5% according to Odom's criteria. Based on this result, patients were divided to 2 groups: a favorable group (n = 48) and an unfavorable group (n = 34). A retrospective review of the baseline characteristics and clinical outcome were conducted to reveal the predictive factors. RESULTS: As expected, improvement of pain and patient satisfaction, was more favorable in the favorable group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the rate of additional procedure was lower in the favorable group (4.2%, 2 of 48 patients) than in the unfavorable group (35.3%, 12 of 34 patients) (p = 0.011). Among the various baseline characteristics, the only significant predictive factor for favorable outcome was the presence of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (50.0% [24 of 48 patients] in the favorable group vs. 11.8% [4 of 34 patients] in the unfavorable group; odds ratio, 15.67; p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Although SELD for lumbar disc herniation resulted in a less favorable clinical outcome than that reported in previous studies, in patients with a HIZ, SELD can be an effective minimally invasive surgery to relieve low back pain and/or leg pain.

Learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy by a single surgeon.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate the learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) from the novice stage to the proficient stage, we performed retrospective study for patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent PETLD performed by a single surgeon and evaluated the surgeon's learning curve and the effect of surgical proficiency on outcomes.A total of 48 patients who underwent PETLD at the lower lumbar level (L3-S1) with a minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled. The learning curve of the surgeon was assessed using cumulative study of operation time and linear regression analyses to reveal the correlation between operation time and case series number.Because the cutoff of familiarity was 25 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, the patients were allocated into two groups: early group (n = 25) and late group (n = 23). The clinical, surgical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the two groups.According to linear regression analyses, the operation time was obtained using the following formula: operation time (minutes) = 69.925-(0.503 × [case number]) (P < .001).As expected, the operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 66.00 ±â€Š11.37 min in the early group vs 50.43 ±â€Š7.52 min in the late group, P < .001). No differences were found between the two groups in demographic data and baseline characteristics. Almost all clinical outcomes (including pain improvement and patient satisfaction), surgical outcomes (including failure, recurrence, and additional procedure rates), and radiological outcomes (including change of disc height and sagittal angles) did not differ between the two groups.However, the late group demonstrated a more favorable postoperative volume index of the remnant disc (362.91 mm3 [95% confidence interval, 272.81-453.02] in the early group vs 161.14 mm3 [95% confidence interval, 124.31-197.97] in the late group, P < .001), and a lower complication rate related to exiting nerve root (16.0% in the early group vs 0% in the late group, P = .045).The learning curve of PETLD is not as difficult as that of other minimally invasive spine surgery technique. Although the overall outcomes were not different between the groups, the risks of incomplete decompression and exiting root injury-related complication were higher in the novice stage.

Learning curve of trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression in herniated lumbar disc disease.

BACKGROUND: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) using slender epiduroscope and a holmium YAG laser is one of the minimally invasive surgical options for lumbar disc herniation. However, the learning curve of SELD and the effect of surgical proficiency on clinical outcome have not yet been established. We investigated patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing SELD to report the clinical outcome and learning curve. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome and learning curve were performed at a single center from clinical data collected from November 2015 to November 2018. A total of 82 patients who underwent single-level SELD for lumbar disc herniation with a minimum follow-up of 6.0 months were enrolled. Based on the findings that the cut-off of familiarity was 20 cases according to the cumulative study of operation time, patients were allocated to two groups: early group (n = 20) and late group (n = 62). The surgical, clinical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated between the two groups to analyze the learning curve of SELD. RESULTS: According to linear and log regression analyses, the operation time was obtained by the formula: operation time = 58.825-(0.181 × [case number]) (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly different between the two groups (mean 56.95 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.12-64.78 in the early group versus mean 45.34 min; 95% CI, 42.45-48.22 in the late group; p = 0.008, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test). Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, clinical factors, and findings of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, did not differ between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes, including complication and failure rates, as well as clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The learning curve of SELD was not as steep as that of other minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques, and the experience of surgery was not an influencing factor for outcome variation.

Analysis of the Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Decompressive Craniectomy between Young and Elderly Patients for Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of decompressive craniectomy between patients < 65 and ≥ 65 years age and investigated prognostics factors that may help predict favorable outcome in acute stroke patients undergoing decompressive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 52 patients diagnosed with acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarction that underwent decompressive craniectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The outcome of all patients were evaluated by assessing the Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), and Modified Rankin scale (mRS) six months after the onset of the disease. 21 patients were preoperatively evaluated with a computed tomography angiography (CTA). Leptomeningeal collateral (LMC) circulation was graded using CTA by experienced neurosurgeons to assess its prognostic value. RESULTS: The thirty day mortality for patients ≥ 65 was 35.0% compared to 37.5% in patients < 65. There was no significant difference in the clinical and function outcome between the two groups (4.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.474). Mortality was lower with early surgery (within 24 hours) group for both age groups (25% vs. 37.5% in ≥ 65, 20% vs. 40.7% in < 65). Longer intensive care units stay time and good collateral supply score were correlated with favorable outcome (p = 0.028, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Decompressive craniectomy within 24 hours of stroke symptom onset improved survival in both the < 65 and ≥ 65 age groups. There was no significant difference in the functional outcome of both age groups. Unlike previous reports, old age, delayed operation, and multiple of infarct territories were not predictive of poor functional outcome. The presence of good collateral circulation may be a predictor of positive clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.

An Evaluation of the Government's Current Guideline on the Hospitalization of Minor Head Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: In June 28, 2012, a 'Hospitalization guideline for car accident patients' was announced to mediate the clash of opinions about the hospitalization of minor head trauma patients among doctors, patients and insurance companies. The guideline was issued to describe the patients' symptoms and emotions in detail after the injury. In this paper, evaluation for the guideline and suggestions for modifications was done. METHODS: Thirty-two doctors, 96 patients and 60 employees were each given surveys about the hospitalization guidelines, related personnels' attitude and evaluation of patients' emotional problems. The frequency, ratio and chi-square test were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight point eight percent of doctors, 79.8% patients and 91.6% insurance company employees agreed to the need for a guideline. Among the 68.8% doctors that supported the need for a guideline, 18.8% knew that the guideline actually existed. Sixty-nine point two percent of doctors said that they would apply the guideline once they were introduced to it. Among the announced guideline provisions, 'Glasgow coma score less than 15' and 'socially not suitable for discharge' required reevaluation since 40.6% all surveyors consented that these two criteria were not suitable. The consensus supporting the need for emotional evaluation came out to be 78.1%, 58.5%, 50.9% in doctors, patients and insurance employees respectively. CONCLUSION: Although a guideline for hospitalization of minor head injury patients is necessary, some part of it seems to be reevaluated and improved, especially for clauses related to the patient's emotional problems. These changes and revisions to the guideline require further speculation and research.